Showing posts with label Fairness Doctrine. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Fairness Doctrine. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 17, 2009

The American Barack Channel


The American Barack Channel

ABC: Prescription for America




And Liberals have the audacity to chastise
talk radio, not to mention the nerve to
deny that the network news is hopelessly biased.
I don't really much care that they are biased,
I care that they are so blind to the fact that they are.

Thursday, March 5, 2009

Slience the Opposition!

Slience the Opposition!

Obama and the Democractic leadership are directly going after Rush, Hannity and even Jim Cramer! Cramer is the Chariman of TheStreet.com and host of Mad Money on CNBC and has recently been, oh no, critical of Obama and The White House. CNBC's Rick Santelli has also been critical and the Team Obama is already getting silenced by CNBC.

I cant believe that we are actually living in a world where politicans are stepping up attacks on their critics... what is the point of the media, the free press, the internet, if not to be the voice of the opposition? 

Is Team Obama so sensitive and protective of their image that it warrents stooping to these levels?

Scary stuff kids...

Update: 

Limbaugh: White House 'Playing Manipulative Games With Washed Up Talking Heads Targeting Me'... 

Jim Cramer: My Response To The White House...

Sunday, March 1, 2009

More good news on the Fairness Doctrine...

Senate Backs Amendment to Prevent 'Fairness Doctrine' Revival

FOXNews - ‎Feb 26, 2009‎
The Senate approved an amendment Thursday that would outlaw the so-called "Fairness Doctrine," an off-the-books policy that once required broadcasters to ...

Friday, February 20, 2009

Rush and Reagan on the Fairness Doctrine



Rush:

Dear President Obama:

I have a straightforward question, which I hope you will answer in a straightforward way: Is it your intention to censor talk radio through a variety of contrivances, such as "local content," "diversity of ownership," and "public interest" rules -- all of which are designed to appeal to populist sentiments but, as you know, are the death knell of talk radio and the AM band? ...

Ronald Reagan: 
"This doctrine . . . requires Federal officials to supervise the editorial practices of broadcasters in an effort to ensure that they provide coverage of controversial issues and a reasonable opportunity for the airing of contrasting viewpoints of those issues. This type of content-based regulation by the Federal Government is . . . antagonistic to the freedom of expression guaranteed by the First Amendment. . . . History has shown that the dangers of an overly timid or biased press cannot be averted through bureaucratic regulation, but only through the freedom and competition that the First Amendment sought to guarantee."


Wednesday, February 18, 2009

Giving credit where credit is due...


-------------------------------------

President Obama opposes any move to bring back the so-called Fairness Doctrine, a spokesman told FOXNews.com Wednesday. 

The statement is the first definitive stance the administration has taken since an aide told an industry publication last summer that Obama opposes the doctrine -- a long-abolished policy that would require broadcasters to provide opposing viewpoints on controversial issues. 

-------------------------------------

AM talk radio is old people internet. Let's keep the government out of both. 



Wednesday, February 11, 2009

A rocky first few weeks

A rocky first few weeks

Obama sputters out of the gate -- but don't fear yet. 

By Camille Paglia (uber-liberal who I happen to agree with more than I would like)

Some highlights:

Money by the barrelful, by the truckload. Mountains of money, heaped like gassy pyramids in the national dump. Scrounging packs of politicos, snapping, snarling and sending green bills flying sky-high as they root through the tangled mass with ragged claws. The stale hot air filled with cries of rage, the gnashing of teeth and dark prophecies of doom.

...

President Obama was ill-served by his advisors (shall we thump that checkered piƱata, Rahm Emanuel?), who evidently did not help him to produce a strong, focused, coherent bill that he could have explained and defended to the nation before it was set upon by partisan wolves. To defer to the House of Representatives and let the bill be thrown together by cacophonous mob rule made the president seem passive and behind the curve.

...

Speaking of talk radio (which I listen to constantly), I remain incredulous that any Democrat who professes liberal values would give a moment's thought to supporting a return of the Fairness Doctrine to muzzle conservative shows. (My latest manifesto on this subject appeared in my last column.) The failure of liberals to master the vibrant medium of talk radio remains puzzling. To reach the radio audience (whether the topic is sports, politics or car repair), a host must have populist instincts and use the robust common voice. Too many Democrats have become arrogant elitists, speaking down in snide, condescending tones toward tradition-minded middle Americans whom they stereotype as rubes and buffoons. But the bottom line is that government surveillance of the ideological content of talk radio is a shocking first step toward totalitarianism.

Tuesday, January 27, 2009

"Republicans should put politics aside..." -Obama


Obama's priorities so far have been ALL ABOUT POLITICS!

Guantanamo, Abortions, Pollution... The messiah's priorities are all jacked up.

Obama is now considering to allow states to impose more restrictive auto emission standards than the national standards. Does he have any clue what this will do to the auto industry!?

It's bad enough that auto manufacturers need to customize (and increase the price of) vehicles for California. Imagine if they had to do that for many different states! It will drive the cost of the cars up, and the sales down.

This also gives Japanese and Korean auto manufacturers an advantage. Who do you think will have an easier time meeting stricter emissions standards, Japan or the US? Korea or the US?

Manufacturing restrictions DO NOT stimulate manufacturing.


And what is this recent focus on Rush Limbaugh? The mainstream media has been talking and writing about how he wants America to fail. They've built Obama up to the point where Obama IS America. Wanting Obama to fail at his liberal objectives means that you want America to fail. That's bullshit! Better hurry up with that Fairness Doctrine! Any American who disagrees with Comrade Obama will be shut down, discredited and arrested!

"The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee has launched an online petition for readers to express their outrage at conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh for saying last week that he wanted President Barack Obama to fail." [1] WTF? What is happening to our country!? Where the fuck is everybody? Put the Kool-Aid down!

Last week, Rush Limbaugh actually said that he "hopes" President Obama fails to meet America’s challenges.

Jobs, health care, our place in the world — the stakes for our nation are high and every American needs President Obama to succeed.

Stand strong against Rush Limbaugh’s Attacks — sign our petition, telling Rush what you think of his attacks on President Obama. We’ll send Limbaugh your comments. [2]


Jobs....Health care....World Peace.... all in Obama's hands.

Obama is the only one who can help you now. Accept him as your savior or be damned to hell.

Obama != USA
Obama != Jesus


PUT...THE...KOOL...AID...DOWN!